Deferred Until Distribution: Assessing the Viability of the Distributed Profit Tax Model for Corporate Taxation in Sub-Saharan Africa
Keywords:
Distributed Profit Tax, Corporate Income Tax, Sub-Saharan Africa, Tax Administration, Estonia, Georgia, Latvia, MoldovaAbstract
Sub-Saharan African corporate income tax systems collect revenue well below their statutory potential, constrained by a narrow formal-sector base, extensive informality, and limited transfer-pricing enforcement capacity. A small number of jurisdictions, Estonia, Georgia, Latvia, and Moldova among them, have addressed a related but distinct problem by taxing corporate profit only at the point of distribution rather than annually, a design known as the distributed profit tax (DPT). The paper examines whether DPT could function as a viable replacement for conventional corporate income tax across Sub-Saharan Africa. It sets out the theoretical case for DPT as a tax on economic rent, surveys its adoption and design variation across the four jurisdictions above, and maps the structural features of Sub-Saharan African CIT regimes that any replacement would have to accommodate. A comparative analysis then weighs DPT's investment-incentive and administrative benefits against its revenue-timing risk and its dependence on anti-avoidance capacity that most Sub-Saharan African administrations have not yet built. The paper concludes that wholesale replacement is not currently defensible, but that a staged, segment-limited adoption, beginning with small and medium enterprises and expanding only as administrative capacity develops, offers a more realistic path, and one that could replace part of the region's existing, discretionary tax-holiday apparatus with a more transparent, rule-based alternative.
References
Abramovsky, L., Klemm, A., & Phillips, D. (2014). Corporate tax in developing countries: Current trends and design issues. Fiscal Studies, 35(4), 559–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2014.12042.x
Bunda, I., & Hanappi, T. (2025). Options to strengthen the tax system in Estonia (IMF Selected Issues Paper No. 2025/102). International Monetary Fund. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/018/2025/102/article-A001-en.xml
Hazak, A. (2008). Profit vs. distributed profit based taxation and companies' capital structure. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 8(5), 524–541. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2008.022319
Hazak, A. (2009). Companies' financial decisions under the distributed profit taxation regime of Estonia. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 45(4), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X450401
Institute for Fiscal Studies. (1978). The structure and reform of direct taxation (Meade Committee Report). George Allen & Unwin.
Institute for Fiscal Studies. (2025). Are corporate tax incentives for investment fit for purpose? Revisiting economic principles and evidence from low- and middle-income countries. IFS. https://ifs.org.uk/publications/are-corporate-tax-incentives-investment-fit-purpose-revisiting-economic-principles-and
Kantšukov, M., & Sander, P. (2018). A lesson in valuation from Estonia: The difference between the fundamental value of equity under distributed and traditional profit taxation systems. Business: Theory and Practice, 19, 46–55. https://journals.vilniustech.lt/index.php/BTP/article/view/8086
Keen, M. (2010). Revenue mobilisation in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges from globalisation II – corporate taxation (IMF Working Paper 09/157). International Monetary Fund.
KPMG Baltics OÜ. (2026). Estonia tax card 2026. KPMG.
Masso, J., & Meriküll, J. (2011). Macroeconomic effects of zero corporate income tax on retained earnings. Baltic Journal of Economics, 11(2), 81–99.
Masso, J., Meriküll, J., & Vahter, P. (2013). Shift from gross profit taxation to distributed profit taxation: Are there effects on firms? Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(4), 1092–1105.
Moldpres. (2025, December 12). Zero rate extended, deductions for education, facilities for green energy in Moldova: What fiscal package approved in first reading includes. Moldpres.
OECD. (2022). Assessing tax relief from targeted investment tax incentives through corporate effective tax rates. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2026). Investment tax incentives in Latin America and the Caribbean: An analysis using effective tax rates (OECD Taxation Working Papers No. 76). OECD Publishing.
OECD/AUC/ATAF. (2025). Revenue Statistics in Africa 2025: Commonalities and specificities across African revenue classifications. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/8d3bf3af-en
PwC. (2026a). Georgia – Corporate: Taxes on corporate income. PwC Worldwide Tax Summaries. https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/georgia/corporate/taxes-on-corporate-income
PwC. (2026b). Latvia – Corporate: Significant developments. PwC Worldwide Tax Summaries. https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/latvia/corporate/significant-developments
Smith, D. (2026, June 30). A week of backlash. Moldova Matters. https://www.moldovamatters.md/p/a-week-of-backlash
Staehr, K. (2014). Corporate income taxation in Estonia. Is it time to abandon dividend taxation? (TUTECON Research Brief No. RB-2014/1). Tallinn University of Technology.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
